Pelham City Council Engages in Spirited Debate over Filling Council Seat Vacancy
Intense Discussion over Process
In the city of Pelham, the city council underwent a vigorous debate as it wrestled with the question of how to fill a vacant council seat. The vacant seat was created by the resignation of Councilwoman Mildred Lanier-Reed. During a regular work session on February 19, the Pelham city council took part in a detailed debate regarding this contentious issue.
Appointment to the Pelham Library Board
Before addressing the vacant council seat issue, the council expedited the appointment of Amy Milling to the Pelham Library Board. Milling was unanimously approved by the members, followed by Councilman Rick Wash’s motion to accept Milling as the appointee, which was seconded by Councilman David Coram. The confirmation of Milling’s appointment became official later in the council meeting during a resolution process.
In Depth Debate on Filling Vacant Council Seat
The now vacant council seat was the focus of discussion for much of the meeting. Interviews for the vacant seat were previously held on February 13 and eight candidates were assessed for the position. Council President Maurice Mercer expressed the necessity for additional interviews with the top candidates due to certain discrepancies in the interview process. However, Councilmembers Chad Leverett and Wash strongly argued that Michael Harris, the top candidate from the first round of interviews, should be considered for the position without any further interviews.
Diverse Opinions on Council Interview Process
A contributing factor to the stalemate was the issue that two of the eight candidates had not been scored by two members of council during their respective interviews. Mercer cited this oversight as a potential indication that the scoring and ranking mechanism had been compromised.
Further Discussion on Harris’ Appointment
Everett voiced strong support for Harris’ appointment stating his belief that Harris should be selected without any delay. He was not alone in this belief. Wash, in defense of his viewpoint, insisted that he and Everett acted in the best interest of the city and their responsibilities as councilmembers.
Mayor Waters Expresses His View
Pelham’s Mayor Gary Waters also lent support towards not conducting another round of interviews. He expressed his trust in Harris’ qualifications and dismissed the concerns relating to Harris’ involvement in local business.
Outcome of the Meeting
The meeting ended on a constructive note where all members were united on other issues under discussion. Despite the disagreements on the hiring process, they unanimously expressed their dedication to the city of Pelham and their commitment to handle disagreements in an agreeable and civil manner.
What’s Next?
The issue of Lanier-Reed’s replacement is scheduled to be discussed in the forthcoming council work session. If the deadlock continues, the ultimate decision lies within the hands of the governor who will receive submissions from the council members and then have 30 days to make an appointment to the seat.
