Community Gathers at Hoover City Hall for Zoning Discussion on Tattersall Park Development
Hoover, Alabama—A significant crowd filled Hoover City Hall on Monday night for a Planning and Zoning Commission meeting focused on a proposed development at Tattersall Park. The developers, Ebsco Industries and Radiant Investments, seek to develop over 33 acres into a multi-use village center featuring more than 300 residential units, a 125-room hotel, and additional retail and restaurant spaces.
Concerns from Local Residents
Many residents expressed their concerns about the potential impact of the project, including increased traffic and shifts in neighborhood dynamics. More than 1,260 people have signed a petition against the proposal, with local voices advocating for the land to remain strictly commercial.
Among the voices in opposition was Ashley Lovell, a resident of Greystone, who organized the petition. “I am not anti-development,” Lovell stated, “but I am for thoughtful development that takes real-time feedback from the community.” She emphasized that the residents feel their input has been overlooked in this proposal.
Details of the Proposed Development
The plan involves constructing up to 170 senior adult multi-family housing units, 137.5 other multi-family units, and up to 45,000 square feet of commercial space. In total, this could allow for 355 multi-family units if adjustments to the plan are proposed. Jimmy Holloway, president of Corporate Realty, noted the developers aim to create a space where residents can easily access shops, restaurants, and green spaces suitable for community activities.
Reactions to Traffic Concerns
While many residents are worried about traffic influx, Aubrey Long, a traffic consultant hired by the developers, claimed residential developments typically generate less traffic than commercial projects. However, Lovell and other residents argued that the city’s existing traffic conditions were already challenging, especially at peak hours.
Historic Zoning Considerations
Greystone community members raised historical points about the land. Ray Fitzpatrick of the Greystone Residential Association reminded attendees that when the Greystone area was annexed into Hoover in 1990, it was designated for planned commercial use. “It should stay commercial,” he insisted, advocating for adherence to prior zoning agreements.
Mary Sue Ludwig, who has been deeply involved with the Greystone Residential Association for nearly three decades, expressed frustration over the ongoing struggle with Ebsco regarding this land. “Every time it has been density,” she remarked, questioning the suitability of this proposal.
Future Meetings and Next Steps
After approximately two hours of discussion, including presentations and public commentary, Ebsco representatives requested a continuance on the matter. They suggested they need additional time to address the community’s questions and concerns before a final vote is taken. The commission aims to reach a decision that reflects community interests and sustains the vision for Hoover.
Planning Commission Chairman Mike Wood encouraged residents to consider potential compromises with the developers, asserting that previous iterations of developments in the area have led to more comprehensive community spaces. “If you try to work with them, there might be a good compromise,” he said.
The next scheduled meeting of the Hoover Planning and Zoning Commission will take place on November 11, where further discussions on the proposed village center are expected.
